Transverse Upper Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction: A 5-Year Consecutive Case Series of Patient-Reported Outcomes

 

by Jessica, Anne Savage; Zhao, Jade; Mackey, Simon; Blackburn, Adam Victor 

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: August 2022 - Volume 150 - Issue 2 - p 258-268

 

Background: 

The transverse upper gracilis flap is an important reconstructive option for patients who desire autologous reconstruction after mastectomy but in whom a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is unavailable or undesirable. The authors present an analysis of outcomes and patient satisfaction results, from a consecutive series in a single institution.

Methods: 

Using a prospectively populated free flap database, all patients undergoing transverse upper gracilis flap breast reconstruction for a mastectomy defect between January of 2013 and December of 2017 were identified. Retrospective review of clinical notes, admissions, and discharge information was conducted to identify outcomes, secondary operations, and complications. All patients were contacted by letter and invited to take part in a patient satisfaction survey a minimum of 12 months after free-flap surgery.

Results: 

Seventy-eight patients underwent transverse upper gracilis flap breast reconstruction using a total of 103 transverse upper gracilis flaps to reconstruct 99 breast mounds in the 5-year period studied. Patient satisfaction is evidenced by BREAST-Q scores showing 81 ± 19 percent Satisfaction with Breasts, 80 ± 20 percent Psychosocial Well-Being, and 84 ± 19 percent Physical Well-Being of the chest. Forty-six of 53 (87 percent) report satisfaction with the postoperative appearance of their thigh unclothed and 51 of 53 (96 percent) report satisfaction clothed.

Conclusions: 

This is the first consecutive series of transverse upper gracilis flap breast reconstruction outcomes that presents BREAST-Q scores for multiple, postoperative reconstruction modules and details complications stratified by Clavien-Dindo score. The methodology can be easily replicated and benchmarked against. Our donor-site complication rates are lower than previous publications and patient satisfaction data reveal that this is a well-accepted option for patients.

 

 

 

 

Prospective Longitudinal Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Effects of Reconstruction Timing

 

by Ochoa, Oscar; Garza, Ramon III; Pisano, Steven; Chrysopoulo, Minas; Ledoux, Peter; Arishita, Gary; Ketchum, Norma; Michalek, Joel E.; Nastala, Chet 

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: May 2022 - Volume 149 - Issue 5 - p 848e-857e

 

Background: 

Without reconstruction, mastectomy alone can produce significant detrimental effects on health-related quality of life. The magnitude of quality-of-life benefits following breast reconstruction may be unique based on timing of reconstruction. Facilitated by the BREAST-Q questionnaire, characterization of how reconstruction timing differentially affects patient-reported quality of life is essential for improved evidence-based clinical practice.

Methods: 

Consecutive DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients prospectively completed BREAST-Q questionnaires preoperatively and at two different time intervals postoperatively. The first (postoperative time point A) and second (postoperative time point B) postoperative questionnaires were completed 1 month postoperatively and following breast revision/symmetry procedures, respectively. Postoperative flap and donor-site complications were recorded prospectively. Stratified by timing (immediate versus delayed) of reconstruction, preoperative clinical data, operative morbidity, and BREAST-Q scores were compared at all time points.

Results: 

Between July of 2012 and August of 2016, 73 patients underwent 130 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Collectively, breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being scores significantly (p < 0.001) increased postoperatively versus baseline. Chest and abdominal physical well-being scores returned to baseline levels by postoperative time point B. Preoperatively, patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction reported significantly (p < 0.05) lower breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being scores compared to immediate reconstruction patients. Postoperatively, delayed and immediate reconstruction patients reported similar quality-of-life scores. Outcome satisfaction and flap and donor-site morbidity were similar between groups irrespective of timing of reconstruction.

Conclusions: 

In this prospective study, patient-reported outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being among patients following DIEP flap reconstruction. Moreover, preoperative differences in quality-of-life scores among delayed/immediate reconstruction patients were eliminated postoperatively.

Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants

 

Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants

 

by Seth, Akhil K.; Cordeiro, Peter G. 

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: September 2020 - Volume 146 - Issue 3 - p 474-484

 

Background:

Outcomes following prosthetic breast reconstruction have been well studied. However, the majority of studies are limited by short-term follow-up and a lack of aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. This study objectively examines long-term surgeon- and patient-reported outcomes following two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Methods:

Consecutive patients undergoing two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction from 1994 to 2016 performed by the senior author (P.G.C.), with at least 1-year follow-up after implant exchange, were reviewed retrospectively. Long-term surgeon-reported outcomes, including aesthetic and capsular contracture scores, and patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q, were recorded at each outpatient visit and analyzed over the 12-year follow-up period.

Results:

Retrospective review revealed 2284 patients, or 3489 breasts, that fit the inclusion criteria. Aesthetic scores and capsular contracture rates remained stable over the entire follow-up period. Subset analysis demonstrated that bilateral and nonirradiated reconstructions consistently had the highest aesthetic scores, whereas unilateral irradiated breasts had the lowest. Irradiated breasts consistently had high rates of capsular contracture, although the extent of contracture improved over time in all patients. Patient-reported BREAST-Q scores showed either stability or improvement over time in all patients. Irradiated and nonirradiated patients demonstrated comparable long-term satisfaction with outcomes despite significant differences in satisfaction with their breasts.

Conclusions:

The authors’ study, the largest of its kind, demonstrates that prosthetic breast reconstruction outcomes do not deteriorate over time. This stability is apparent in both long-term surgeon- and patient-reported outcomes data measured in the same patients. These results contradict the surgical dogma surrounding prosthetic breast reconstruction and therefore should be given significant consideration when counseling patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Four Common Surgical Treatment Options for Breast Cancer and the Effect of Complications: A Retrospective Patient-Reported Survey among 1871 Patients

Link to article: Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Four Common Surgical Treatment Options for Breast Cancer and the Effect of Complications: A Retrospective Patient-Reported Survey among 1871 Patients

by Kouwenberg, Casimir A. E.; de Ligt, Kelly M.; Kranenburg, Leonieke W.; Rakhorst, Hinne; de Leeuw, Daniëlle; Siesling, Sabine; Busschbach, Jan J.; Mureau, Marc A. M.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: July 2020 - Volume 146 - Issue 1 - p 1-13

Background:

Differences in quality-of-life outcomes after different surgical breast cancer treatment options, including breast reconstruction, are relevant for counseling individual patients in clinical decision-making, and for (societal) evaluations such as cost-effectiveness analyses. However, current literature shows contradictory results, because of use of different patient-reported outcome measures and study designs with limited patient numbers. The authors set out to improve this evidence using patient-reported outcome measures in a large, cross-sectional study for different surgical breast cancer treatment options.

Methods:

Quality of life was assessed through the EQ-5D-5L, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and BR23, and the BREAST-Q. Patients with different treatments were compared after propensity-weighted adjustment of pretreatment differences. The EQ-5D was used to value the effect of surgical complications.

Results:

A total of 1871 breast cancer patients participated (breast-conserving surgery, n = 615; mastectomy, n = 507; autologous reconstruction, n = 330; and implant-based reconstruction, n = 419). Mastectomy patients reported the lowest EQ-5D score (mastectomy, 0.805, breast-conserving surgery, 0.844; autologous reconstruction, 0.849; and implant-based reconstruction, 0.850) and functioning scores of the C30 questionnaire. On the BREAST-Q, autologous reconstruction patients had higher mean Satisfaction with Outcome, Satisfaction with Breasts, and Sexual Well-being scores than implant-based reconstruction patients. Complications in autologous reconstruction patients resulted in a substantially lower quality of life than in implant-based reconstruction patients.

Conclusions:

This study shows the added value of breast conservation and reconstruction compared with mastectomy; however, differences among breast-conserving surgery, implant-based reconstruction, and autologous breast reconstruction were subtle. Complications resulted in poorer health-related quality of life.

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Irradiation of Tissue Expander versus Permanent Implant in Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Irradiation of Tissue Expander versus Permanent Implant in Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Study

by Yoon, Alfred P.; Qi, Ji; Kim, Hyungjin M.; Hamill, Jennifer B.; Jagsi, Reshma; Pusic, Andrea L.; Wilkins, Edwin G.; Kozlow, Jeffrey H.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: May 2020 - Volume 145 - Issue 5 - p 917e-926e

Background: Whether to irradiate the tissue expander before implant exchange or to defer irradiation until after exchange in immediate, two-stage expander/implant reconstruction remains uncertain. The authors evaluated the effects of irradiation timing on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing immediate expander/implant reconstruction.

Methods: Immediate expander/implant reconstruction patients undergoing postmastectomy radiation therapy at 11 Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium sites with demographic, clinical, and complication data were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with BREAST-Q, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer–Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire surveys preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Survey scores and complication rates were analyzed using bivariate comparison and multivariable regressions.

Results: Of 317 patients who met inclusion criteria, 237 underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy before expander/implant exchange (before-exchange cohort), and 80 did so after exchange (after-exchange cohort). Timing of radiation had no significant effect on risks of overall complications (OR, 1.25; p = 0.46), major complications (OR, 1.18; p = 0.62), or reconstructive failure (OR, 0.72; p = 0.49). Similarly, radiation timing had no significant effect on 2-year patient-reported outcomes measured by the BREAST-Q or the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer survey. Outcomes measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System showed less anxiety, fatigue, and depression in the after-exchange group. Compared with preoperative assessments, 2-year patient-reported outcomes significantly declined in both cohorts for Satisfaction with Breasts, Physical Well-Being, and Sexual Well-Being, but improved for anxiety and depression.

Conclusions: Radiation timing (before or after exchange) had no significant effect on complication risks or on most patient-reported outcomes in immediate expander/implant reconstruction. Although lower levels of anxiety, depression, and fatigue were observed in the after-exchange group, these differences may not be clinically significant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Patient-reported health problems and healthcare use after treatment for early-stage breast cancer

Patient-reported health problems and healthcare use after treatment for early-stage breast cancer

The Breast: August 2019 Volume 46, Pages 4–11

by K.M. de Ligt, M. Heins, J. Verloop, C.H. Smorenburg, J.C. Korevaar, S. Siesling 

A clear picture of treatment-related health problems following breast cancer treatment is useful in anticipating the informational and other needs of patients during follow-up. This study aimed to identify treatment-related health problems in breast cancer patients up to five years after diagnosis. Secondly, the use of care associated with these health problems was identified.

Optimizing DIEP Flap Insetting for Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcomes

Optimizing DIEP Flap Insetting for Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcomes

 by Razzano, Sergio; Marongiu, Francesco; Wade, Ryckie; Figus, Andrea  

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: February 2019 - Volume 143 - Issue 2 - p 261e–270e

Background: To improve the aesthetic outcome of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, flaps should be tailored to the patient’s characteristics. A single method of DIEP flap insetting will not suffice for all women seeking breast reconstruction. The authors share the outcomes of a prospective longitudinal study on DIEP flap insetting and present an algorithm for reconstruction.

Methods: Over 4 years, 70 consecutive immediate unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions were prospectively evaluated. DIEP insetting was based on the characteristics of the donor site and contralateral breast, according to the authors’ algorithm. Baseline and outcome data were collected. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by a panel of three independent assessors, and patient-reported outcomes were quantified using the BREAST-Q at 1 year after reconstruction.

Results: Seventy women underwent reconstruction. There were no total or partial flap failures, four cases of fat necrosis, and 14 revision operations. Women reported a mean overall BREAST-Q score of 82 of 100, representing excellent satisfaction but poor satisfaction with sexual well-being. BREAST-Q scores were not associated with age or body mass index. Fat necrosis reduced satisfaction with the chest (absolute mean reduction, 13; 95 percent CI, 8 to 18; p = 0.002). Independent assessors scored the outcomes favorably, but there was no agreement between surgeons, nurses, and lay assessors. Conclusions: The authors’ algorithm can support surgeons in selecting individually tailored DIEP flap insetting to achieve excellent aesthetic outcomes. Further research is needed as to the relevance of scores from BREAST-Q in relation to interventions. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life

Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life

by Coriddi, Michelle; Shenaq, Deana; Kenworthy, Elizabeth; Mbabuike, Jacques; Nelson, Jonas; Pusic, Andrea; Mehrara, Babak; Disa, Joseph J.  

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: February 2019 - Volume 143 - Issue 2 - p 373–379

Background: There is a subset of patients who initially undergo implant-based breast reconstruction but later change to autologous reconstruction after failure of the implant reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes and quality of life in this group of patients.

Methods: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database was performed and BREAST-Q surveys were evaluated.

Results: One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant-based reconstruction with 192 total flaps. Failure of implant reconstruction was defined as follows: capsular contracture causing pain and/or cosmetic deformity [n = 106 (77 percent)], dissatisfaction with the aesthetic result [n = 15 (11 percent)], impending exposure of the implant/infection [n = 8 (6 percent)], and unknown [n = 8 (6 percent)]. Complications requiring operative intervention included partial flap loss [n = 5 (3 percent)], hematoma [n = 5 (3 percent)], vascular compromise requiring intervention for salvage [n = 2 (1 percent)], and total flap loss [n = 1 (1 percent)]. Thirty-four patients (23 percent) had BREAST-Q surveys. There was a statistically significant increase in overall outcomes (p < 0.001), satisfaction with appearance of breasts (p < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), and physical well-being of the chest (p = 0.003). A statistically significant decrease in physical well-being of the abdomen was observed (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Autologous breast reconstruction after failed implant-based reconstruction has an acceptable complication rate and is associated with significantly improved patient satisfaction and quality of life. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

[Review] Statistical analysis of patient-reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review

The Lancet Oncology: Review: Volume 19, issue 9, PE459-PE469, September 01, 2018

Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life, are important endpoints in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), there is little consensus about the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of these data. We did a systematic review to assess the variability, quality, and standards of PRO data analyses in advanced breast cancer RCTs. We searched PubMed for English language articles published in peer-reviewed journals between Jan 1, 2001, and Oct 30, 2017. Eligible articles were those that reported PRO results from RCTs of adult patients with advanced breast cancer receiving anti-cancer treatments with reported sample sizes of at least 50 patients—66 RCTs met the selection criteria.

Happy and Unhappy Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Breast Augmentation

Happy and Unhappy Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Breast Augmentation

by Dorfman, Robert G.; Purnell, Chad; Qiu, Cecil; Ellis, Marco F.; Basu, C. Bob; Kim, John Y. S.  

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: May 2018 - Volume 141 - Issue 5 - p 663e–673e

Background: Online reviews have become modern versions of the word-of-mouth recommendation, and prospective patients are increasingly consulting them before making decisions about their surgical care. The authors’ objectives were to (1) identify trends in the use of online reviews, and (2) important reasons for patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with aesthetic surgery. The authors selected breast augmentation as the primary procedure of interest. Methods: Reviews of the top 10 to 20 most reviewed plastic surgeons in each of six large metropolitan areas were obtained from Google, Yelp, and RealSelf. Reviews were assessed for predefined dimensions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Results: A total of 1077 breast augmentation reviews were obtained. Ratings were distributed bimodally, with peaks at five stars and one star. The majority of reviews were positive (87.5 percent). Relative popularity of Google versus Yelp varied across geographic regions, and average rating varied by platform. Between 2011 and 2016, the number of online reviews for breast augmentation grew at an average rate of 42.6 percent per year. Aesthetic outcome was the most commonly cited dimension (69.8 percent of reviews), whereas cost was mentioned in only 7.8 percent of reviews. A substantial minority of negative Yelp (37 percent) and Google (9.4 percent) reviews were written by patients who did not actually undergo surgery. Free-text analysis of heterogeneous reviews (containing positive and negative attributes) classified dimensions as critical, redeemable, or protective. Conclusion: As the influence of online review platforms continues to grow, understanding drivers of positive and negative reviews may help surgeons improve patient satisfaction.

Top ten concerns burdening people with cancer: Perceptions of patients with cancer and the nurses caring for them.

Top ten concerns burdening people with cancer: Perceptions of patients with cancer and the nurses caring for them.
Author(s) Mitchell, Keith S J; Delfont, Sarah; Bracey, Maria Lucinda; Endacott, Ruth

Source European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society; Apr 2018; vol. 33 ; p. 102-106

Publication Date Apr 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.02.004
ISSN 1532-2122
Database Medline

PURPOSEWe examined the concerns that nurses perceive patients to have, whether these are congruent with patients' concerns and whether they vary according to cancer site. We also examined Distress Thermometer scores according to cancer site.METHODA cross-sectional survey design: (i) secondary analysis of an existing Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) and Distress Thermometer (DT) dataset was used, (ii) a survey of specialist nurse teams to identify their perceptions of patient concerns. Data collected between January 2015 and June 2016 from the HNA database from one NHS Trust in England (n = 1233 patients). Specialist nurse teams for breast, colorectal, gynaecology, skin and urology cancers identified the concerns that they perceived their patients would report.RESULTSThe HNA showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Across the five cancer sites, nurses identified between 3 and 6 of the top ten concerns (TTC) expressed by patients, with wide variation across cancer sites. Nine of the TTC were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with a specific cancer site. The breast and gynaecological cancer groups both recorded significantly higher median Distress Thermometer scores than the urology, skin and colorectal cancer groups (Kruskall-Wallis χ2 (4, n = 1228) 186.695, p=<.01).CONCLUSIONSOne of the aims of the eHNA is to enable service delivery appropriate to patient needs. Our findings suggest that this will only be achieved if eHNA is examined, and services developed, by individual cancer site. The misconception of patient needs by specialist nurses underscores the importance of review of information provided by patients during consultations.

Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Khavanin N et al
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery: May 2017 - Volume 139 - Issue 5 - p1063 -1070

Background: Since the 2012 approval of shaped implants, their use in breast reconstruction has increased in the United States. However, large-scale comparisons of complications and patient-reported outcomes are lacking. The authors endeavored to compare surgical and patient-reported outcomes across implant types. 
Methods: The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium database was queried for expander/implant reconstructions with at least 1-year postexchange follow-up (mean, 18.5 months). Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, 1-year revisions, and patient-reported outcomes. Bivariate and mixed-effects regression analyses evaluated the effect of implant type on patient outcomes. 
Results: Overall, 822 patients (73.5 percent) received round and 297 patients (26.5 percent) received shaped implants. Patients undergoing unilateral reconstructions with round implants underwent more contralateral symmetry procedures, including augmentations (round, 18.7 percent; shaped, 6.8 percent; p = 0.003) and reductions (round, 32.2 percent; shaped, 20.5 percent; p = 0.019). Shaped implants were associated with higher rates of infection (shaped, 6.1 percent; round, 2.3 percent; p = 0.002), that remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Other complication rates did not differ significantly between cohorts. Round and shaped implants experienced similar 2-year patient-reported outcome scores. 
Conclusions: This prospective, multicenter study is the largest evaluating outcomes of shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction. Although recipients of round implants demonstrated lower infection rates compared with shaped implants, these patients were more likely to undergo contralateral symmetry procedures. Both implant types yielded comparable patient-reported outcome scores. With appropriate patient selection, both shaped and round implants can provide acceptable outcomes in breast reconstruction.