Showing posts with label SEER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEER. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 September 2022

 

Nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with triple-negative apocrine breast cancer: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis

 

by Yinggang Xu, Weiwei Zhang, Jinzhi He, Ye Wang, Rui Chen, Wenjie Shi, Xinyu Wan, Xiaoqing Shi, Xiaofeng Huang, Jue Wang, Xiaoming Zha 

 

The Breast: September 01, 2022

 

Purpose

Triple-negative apocrine carcinoma (TNAC) is a sort of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that is rare and prognosis of these patients is unclear. The present study constructed an effective nomogram to assist in predicting TNAC patients overall survival (OS).

Methods

A total of 373 TNAC patients from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) got extracted from 2010 to 2016 and were divided into training (n = 261) and external validation (n = 112) groups (split ratio, 7:3) randomly. A Cox regression model was utilized to creating a nomogram according to the risk factors affecting prognosis. The predictive capability of the nomogram was estimated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed age, surgery, chemotherapy, stage, and first malignant primary as independent predictors of OS. A prediction model was constructed and virtualized using the nomogram. The time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) showed satisfactory discrimination of the nomogram. Good consistency was shown on the calibration curves in OS between actual observations and the nomogram prediction. What's more, DCA showed that the nomogram had incredible clinical utility. Through separating the patients into groups of low and high risk group that connects with the risk system that shows a huge difference between the low-risk and high risk OS (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

To predict the OS in TNAC patients, the nomogram utilizing the risk stratification system that is corresponding. These tools may help to evaluate patient prognosis and guide treatment decisions.

Tuesday, 5 July 2022

 

The role of postoperative radiation therapy in stage I–III male breast cancer: A population-based study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

by Peiwen Wu, Dongjie He, Shuchai Zhu, Hao Chang, Qiming Wang, Qiuju Shao, Gaiyan Li 

The Breast: Published: June 22, 2022

 

Background

This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant radiation therapy in a large population-based cohort of patients with stage I–III male breast cancer (MaBC).

Methods

Patients with stage I–III breast cancer treated with surgery were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer database from 2010 to 2015. Multivariate logistic regression identified the predictors of receiving radiation therapy. Multivariate Cox regression model were used to evaluate the predictors of survival.

Results

We identified 1321 patients. Age, stage, positive regional nodes, surgical procedure, and HER2 status were strong predictors of radiation therapy administration. There was no difference between patients who received radiation therapy and those who did not (P = 0.46); however, after propensity score matching, it was associated with improved OS (P = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with better OS were administration of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. In the subset analysis, adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved OS in men undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), with four or more node-positive or larger primary tumours (T3/T4). Furthermore, we found no benefit of radiation therapy, regardless of the type of axillary surgery in mastectomy (MS). In older MaBC patients with T1-2N1 who underwent MS, radiation therapy showed no significant effects, regardless of chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Adjuvant radiation therapy could improve the survival of MaBC patients undergoing BCS, with four or more node-positive or larger primary tumours. Moreover, it should be carefully considered in patients undergoing MS and older T1-2N1 patients.