Defining Enhanced Recovery Pathway with or without Liposomal Bupivacaine in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

 

by Haddock, Nicholas T.; Garza, Ricardo; Boyle, Carolyn E.; Liu, Yulun; Teotia, Sumeet S. 

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: November 2021 - Volume 148 - Issue 5 - p 948-957

 

Background:

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) includes multiple interventions that have yielded positive outcomes in a number of surgical fields. The authors evaluated whether an ERAS protocol and the subsequent addition of liposomal bupivacaine affect patient outcomes specifically in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.

Methods:

All patients treated with DIEP flaps from January of 2016 to December of 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The ERAS protocol was implemented midway through 2017; halfway through 2018, intraoperative transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine were added to the protocol. Such interventions allowed for comparison of three patient groups: before ERAS, during ERAS, and after ERAS plus liposomal bupivacaine. Primary outcomes observed were postoperative opioid consumption and length of stay. The p values were obtained using the Wilcoxon test for pairwise comparisons.

Results:

After adjusting for ERAS group compliance, 216 patients were analyzed. The pre-ERAS group was composed of 67 patients, the ERAS group was composed of 69 patients, and the ERAS plus liposomal bupivacaine group was composed of 80 patients. Postoperative opioid consumption was reduced when comparing the pre-ERAS and ERAS groups (from 275.7 oral morphine equivalents to 146.7 oral morphine equivalents; p < 0.0001), and also reduced with the addition of liposomal bupivacaine (115.3 oral morphine equivalents; p = 0.016). Furthermore, hospital length of stay was decreased from 3.6 days in the pre-ERAS group to 3.2 days (p = 0.0029) in the ERAS group, and to 2.6 days (p < 0.0001) in the ERAS group plus liposomal bupivacaine groups.

Conclusions:

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols decrease postoperative opioid consumption and hospital length of stay in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The addition of liposomal bupivacaine further strengthens the impact of the protocol. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

 

Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

 

by N. Gort, B.G.I. van Gaal, H.J.P. Tielemans, D.J.O. Ulrich, S. Hummelink 

 

The Breast: August 19, 2021

 

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are successfully implemented in different surgical specialties, but a specific protocol for autologous breast reconstruction is missing. The aim of this study was to determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol contributes to a reduced length of stay without an increase in postoperative complications for patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Materials en methods

The effect of the ERAS protocol was examined using a single-center patient-control study comparing two groups of patients. Patients who underwent surgery between November 2017 and November 2018 using the ERAS protocol were compared with a historical control group (pre-ERAS) who underwent surgery between November 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain and postoperative complications.

Results

152 patients were included (ERAS group, n = 73; control group, n = 79). Mean hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (5 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). The average pain score was 1.73 in de the ERAS group compared to 2.17 in the control group (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complications. The ERAS group experienced less constipation (41 vs. 25 patients, p = 0.028).

Conclusion

An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol contributes an accelerated postoperative recovery of patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In this study a significant decrease was found in hospital length of stay, patient-reported pain score and adverse health issues.