Showing posts with label Cost analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cost analysis. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 March 2022

 

Microvascular Breast Reconstruction in the Era of Value-Based Care: Use of a Cosurgeon Is Associated with Reduced Costs, Improved Outcomes, and Added Value

 

by Mericli, Alexander F.; Chu, Carrie K.; Sisk, Geoffroy C.; Largo, Rene D.; Schaverien, Mark V.; Liu, Jun; Villa, Mark T.; Garvey, Patrick B. 

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: February 2022 - Volume 149 - Issue 2 - p 338-348

 

Background: Reducing complications while controlling costs is a central tenet of value-based health care. Bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction is a long operation with a relatively high complication rate. Using a two-surgeon team has been shown to improve safety in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction; however, its impact on cost and efficiency has not been robustly studied. The authors hypothesized that a cosurgeon for bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction is safe, effective, and associated with reduced costs.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction with either a single surgeon or surgeon/cosurgeon team over an 18-month period. Charges were converted to costs using the authors’ institutional cost-to-charge ratio. Surgeon opportunity costs were estimated using time-driven activity-based costing. Propensity scoring controlled for baseline characteristics between the two groups. A locally weighted logistic regression model analyzed the cosurgeon’s impact on outcomes and costs.

Results: The authors included 150 bilateral microvascular breast reconstructions (60 single-surgeon and 90 surgeon/cosurgeon reconstructions) with a median follow-up of 15 months. After matching, the presence of a cosurgeon was associated with a significantly reduced mean operative duration (change in operative duration, −107 minutes; p < 0.001) and cost (change in total cost, −$1101.50; p < 0.001), which was even more pronounced when surgeon/cosurgeon teams worked together frequently (change in operative duration, −132 minutes; change in total cost, −$1389; p = 0.007). The weighted logistic regression models identified that a cosurgeon was protective against breast-site complications and trended toward reduced overall and major complication rates.

Conclusion: The practice of using a of cosurgeon appears to be associated with reduced costs and improved outcomes, thereby potentially adding value to bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Tuesday, 16 November 2021

 

Palbociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors in patients ≥ 75 years with oestrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative advanced breast cancer: A real-world multicentre UK study

 

by Salma El Badri, Bilal Tahir, Kirsty Balachandran, Pavel Bezecny, Fiona Britton, Mark Davies, Karen Desouza, Simon Dixon, Daniel Hills, Maung Moe, Thomas Pigott, Andrew Proctor, Yatri Shah, Richard Simcock, Anna Stansfeld, Alicja Synowiec, Marianna Theodoulou, Mark Verrill, Anshu Wadhawan, Catherine Harper-Wynne, Caroline Wilson

 

The Breast: FULL LENGTH ARTICLE| VOLUME 60, P199-205, DECEMBER 01, 2021

 

Background

Breast cancer incidence increases with age and real-world data is essential to guide prescribing practices in the older population. The aim of this study was to collect large scale real-world data on tolerability and efficacy of palbociclib + AI in the first line treatment of ER+/HER2-advanced breast cancer in those aged ≥75 years.

Methods

14 cancer centres participated in this national UK retrospective study. Patients aged ≥75 years treated with palbociclib + AI in the first line setting were identified. Data included baseline demographics, disease characteristics, toxicities, dose reductions and delays, treatment response and survival data. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess independent predictors of PFS, OS and toxicities.

Results

276 patients met the eligibility criteria. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (2.2%). The clinical benefit rate was 87%. 50.7% of patients had dose reductions and 59.3% had dose delays. The 12- and 24- month PFS rates were 75.9% and 64.9%, respectively. The 12- and 24- month OS rates were 85.1% and 74.0%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified PS, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and number of metastatic sites to be independent predictors of PFS. Dose reductions and delays were not associated with adverse survival outcomes. Baseline ACCI was an independent predictor of development and severity of neutropenia.

Conclusion

Palbociclib is an effective therapy in the real-world older population and is well-tolerated with low levels of clinically significant toxicities. The use of geriatric and frailty assessments can help guide decision making in these patients.