Showing posts with label Tissue expander placement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tissue expander placement. Show all posts

Wednesday, 23 January 2019

Tissue Expander Complications Do Not Preclude a Second Successful Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction



by Poppler, Louis H.; Mundschenk, Minh-Bao; Linkugel, Andrew; Zubovic, Ema; Dolen, Utku C.; Myckatyn, Terence M.  

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: January 2019 - Volume 143 - Issue 1 - p 24–34

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common method of breast reconstruction in the United States, but the outcomes of subsequent implant-based reconstruction after a tissue expander complication are rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term incidence of implant loss in patents with a previous tissue expander complication. Methods: This is a retrospective review of the long-term outcomes of all patients with tissue expander complications at a large academic medical center from 2003 to 2013. Patients with subsequent tissue expander or implant complications were compared to those with no further complications to assess risk factors for additional complications or reconstructive failure.
Results: One hundred sixty-two women were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 3.1 years. Forty-eight women (30 percent) went on to undergo a second tissue expander or implant placement. They did not differ from women who went on to autologous reconstruction or no further reconstruction. Of these, 34 women (71 percent) had no further complications and 38 women (79 percent) had a successful implant-based reconstruction at final follow-up. There were no patient or surgical factors significantly associated with a second complication or implant loss. 
Conclusions: Following tissue expander complications, it is reasonable to offer women a second attempt at tissue expansion and implant placement. This study demonstrates that long-term success rates are high, and there are no definitive patient or surgical factors that preclude a second attempt at implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Thursday, 10 March 2016

Impact of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Impact of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 4. [Epub ahead of print]

Dolen UC et al


BACKGROUND: Delayed wound healing or infection leads to premature tissue expander (TE) explantation after immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction. A large study with sufficient duration of follow-up focusing on the impact of chemotherapy (CT) on premature TE removal after immediate breast reconstruction is lacking.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing immediate TE reconstruction was conducted. Multivariate analyses identified factors contributing to premature removal of TEs including neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT, specific chemotherapeutic regimens, and other factors like cancer stage, body mass index, smoking, radiation, and age. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to study the timing of premature TE removal.
RESULTS: Of 899 patients with TEs, 256 received no, 295 neoadjuvant, and 348 adjuvant CT. Premature removal occurred more frequently in the neoadjuvant (17.3 %) and adjuvant (19.9 %) cohorts than the no-CT (12.5 %) cohort (p = 0.056). Premature TE removal occurred earlier (p = 0.005) in patients who received no CT than those with adjuvant CT. Radiation in patients receiving neoadjuvant CT prolonged the mean time to premature removal (p = 0.003). In the absence of radiation, premature removal occurred significantly sooner with neoadjuvant than adjuvant CT (p = 0.035).

DISCUSSION: Premature removal of a TE occurs more commonly in patients treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant CT and is most commonly observed 2-3 months after placement-well after the follow-up period recorded by the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. These findings can be used to aid preoperative counseling and guide the timing of follow-up for these patients.

Monday, 24 November 2014

Analysis of risk factors for complications in expander/implant breast reconstruction by stage of reconstruction

Analysis of risk factors for complications in expander/implant breast reconstruction by stage of reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nov 2014, Vol. 134(5), p.692e-699e

Hirsch, E.M., et al.

http://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Fulltext/2014/11000/Analysis_of_Risk_Factors_for_Complications_in.7.aspx

Expander/implant breast reconstruction is a common approach to breast reconstruction. Although several studies evaluate risk factors for complications during the overall reconstructive process, no studies currently evaluate risk factors by stage of reconstruction. This information is important, as it can help guide physician and patient decision making.

Monday, 27 October 2014

Patient activated controlled expansion for breast reconstruction using controlled carbon dioxide inflation

Patient activated controlled expansion for breast reconstruction using controlled carbon dioxide inflation: Confirmation of a feasibility study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, October 2014, Vol. 134(4), p.503e-511e.

Connell, T.

http://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Fulltext/2014/10000/Patient_Activated_Controlled_Expansion_for_Breast.2.aspx


Women with breast cancer or those at high risk of developing breast cancer because of familial history of the disease or genetic mutations are frequently indicated for therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy. Prosthetic reconstruction of the breast with placement of tissue expanders followed by implants offers favorable aesthetic and psychological results while adding only minimal additional surgical intervention. This study describes the confirmatory phase of an earlier feasibility trial that involved seven women who successfully underwent patient-activated controlled expansion for breast reconstruction with 10 AeroForm patient-controlled tissue expanders.
Methods: A prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-surgeon confirmatory study in Perth, Australia, evaluated outcomes of two-stage breast reconstruction using the investigational device. Each subject administered a preset 10-cc dose of carbon dioxide gas using a remote dosage controller, three times each day, with a 3-hour lockout between doses until full expansion was achieved.
Results: Thirty-three women with breast cancer, family history, or predisposition because of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation underwent pedicled latissimus dorsi flap procedures with placement of 61 carbon dioxide–based tissue expanders. The mean number of days for subjects to achieve desired expansion was 17 ± 5. Operating the dosage controller was described by the surgeon as very easy in 94 percent of the cases and by 97 percent of the subjects. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: This study confirms that the AeroForm breast tissue expander has demonstrated the ability to provide, relative to saline expanders, a needle-free, patient-controlled, convenient, and time-saving method of tissue expansion.




Thursday, 7 August 2014

Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders

Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders: Implementation of a standardized best practices protocol to reduce infection rates. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery July 2014, Vol. 134(1), p.11-18.

Khansa, I., et al.

http://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2014/07000/Breast_Reconstruction_with_Tissue_Expanders__.4.aspx

Periprosthetic infection remains a frustrating and costly complication of breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. Although some specific steps have been previously shown to reduce periprosthetic infections, no comprehensive protocol addressing all aspects of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient management has been evaluated in the literature. The authors’ goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of their protocol at reducing periprosthetic infections.

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Vol 127 Iss 3 March 2011

Access these articles using your Athens username and password

Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment and Prevention of Implant-Associated Breast Deformities.
pg. 1047-1058
Spear, Scott L. M.D et al.

A Reliable Method for the Preoperative Estimation of Tissue to Be Removed during Reduction Mammaplasty.
pg. 1059-1064
Kocak, Ergun M.D et al.

Effect of Intraoperative Saline Fill Volume on Perioperative Outcomes in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.
pg. 1065-1072
Crosby, Melissa A. M.D et al.

Preventing Venous Congestion of the Nipple-Areola Complex: An Anatomical Guide to Preserving Essential Venous Drainage Networks.
pg. 1073-1079
le Roux, Cara Michelle B.Biomed.Sc., B.Sc.(Hons.) et al.

Tissue Oximetry Monitoring in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Decreases Flap Loss and Improves Rate of Flap Salvage.
pg. 1080-1085
Lin, Samuel J. M.D et al.

Morbidity of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Comorbid Conditions.
pg. 1086-1092
Seidenstuecker, Katrin M.D et al.

Stacked Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Review of 110 Flaps in 55 Cases over 3 Years.
pg. 1093-1099
DellaCroce, Frank J. M.D et al.

Optimal Timing of Delayed Free Lower Abdominal Flap Breast Reconstruction after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.
pg. 1100-1106
Baumann, Donald P. M.D et al.

Contouring the Inferior Pole of the Breast in Vertical Mammaplasty: Suction-Assisted Lipectomy versus Direct Defatting.
pg. 1314-1322
Akyurek, Mustafa M.D., Ph.D.

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in a Patient with Subungual Melanoma after Transaxillary Breast Augmentation.
pg. 65e-66e
Graf, Ruth Maria M.D., Ph.D et al.