Thursday 10 March 2016

Time for a randomised clinical trial evaluating breast conserving surgery compared to mastectomy in ipsilateral mutlifocal breast cancer (MFBC)?

Time for a randomised clinical trial evaluating breast conserving surgery compared to mastectomy in ipsilateral mutlifocal breast cancer (MFBC)?

The Breast [Article in Press]

Winters Z et al

Nijenhuis et al. (2015) are to be commended for reviewing the role of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the treatment of Multifocal Breast Cancers (MFBC) [1]. Currently, evidence-based guidelines on recommended surgical treatments in MFBC are based on limited evidence. A systematic review [2] critically evaluating the published literature has led us to conclude the following: 1) Studies of MFBC would benefit from standardized imaging, ideally with MRI providing detailed and accurate anatomic extent; 2) Modern trials would ideally evaluate neoadjuvant therapy, where therapeutic response can be evaluated; 3) Tumour subtype (immunohistochemical markers) of each cancer should be used in a minimized randomization design; 4) There is poor clinical evidence for the feasibility of dual tumour bed radiotherapy (RT) boosting and its impact on outcomes; 5) Meta-analyses on RT for unifocal cancers underline the significance of 10-year first recurrence and not breast cancer death; 6) Effect-sizes for 5-year local recurrence requires intergroup comparisons of surgery types (BCS versus mastectomy) far in excess of reported studies, where multicentric cancers are included and MFBC are clinically diagnosed; 7) Lack of convincing outcomes data on 5-year local recurrence after BCS is motivating a large international collaborative supported by respective international and national associations of breast surgery.