Showing posts with label Imaging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Imaging. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 December 2020

The Influence of Fat Grafting on Breast Imaging after Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Analysis

 

The Influence of Fat Grafting on Breast Imaging after Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Analysis

 

by Cason, Roger W.; Shammas, Ronnie L.; Broadwater, Gloria; Glener, Adam D.; Sergesketter, Amanda R.; Vernon, Rebecca; Le, Elliot; Wickenheisser, Victoria A.; Marks, Caitlin E.; Orr, Jonah; Pyfer, Bryan J.; Hollenbeck, Scott T.

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: December 2020 - Volume 146 - Issue 6 - p 1227-1236

 

Background:

Fat grafting to the reconstructed breast may result in the development of benign lesions on physical examination, prompting further investigation with imaging and biopsy. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of fat grafting on the incidence of imaging and biopsies after postmastectomy reconstruction.

Methods:

Patients who underwent autologous or implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy from 2010 to 2018 were identified. Those receiving fat grafting as part of their reconstructive course were propensity matched 1:1 to those that did not with body mass index, reconstruction timing, and reconstruction type as covariates in a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results:

A total of 186 patients were identified, yielding 93 propensity-matched pairs. Fat-grafted patients had higher incidences of palpable masses (38.0 percent versus 18.3 percent; p = 0.003) and postreconstruction imaging (47.3 percent versus 29.0 percent; p = 0.01), but no significant difference in the number of biopsies performed (11.8 percent versus 7.5 percent; p = 0.32). Imaging was predominately interpreted as normal (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 1, 27.9 percent) or benign (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 2, 48.8 percent), with fat necrosis being the most common finding [n = 20 (45.5 percent)]. No demographic, oncologic, reconstructive, or fat grafting–specific variables were predictive of receiving postreconstruction imaging on multivariate analysis. Fat grafting was not associated with decreased 5-year overall survival or locoregional recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions:

Fat grafting to the reconstructed breast is associated with increased incidences of palpable masses and subsequent postreconstruction imaging with benign radiographic findings. Although the procedure is oncologically safe, both patients and providers should be aware that concerning physical examination findings can be benign sequelae of fat grafting and may lead to increased imaging after breast reconstruction. Clinical Question/Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Tuesday, 14 August 2018

[News] Mammography deficiencies: the result of poor positioning



The Lancet Oncology by Elizabeth Gourd  


NEWS| VOLUME 19, ISSUE 8, PE385, AUGUST 01, 2018

Poor patient positioning is the leading cause of clinical image deficiencies and accreditation failures in mammography, according to a recent investigation.

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer

Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. The breast, April 2012, Vol. 21(2), p.112-123.

Brennan, M.E., & Houssami, N.


While guidelines recommend against routine use of staging imaging to detect asymptomatic distant metastases (DM) in newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC), modern imaging technologies may have improved detection capability and may have a role in some cases.

Thursday, 8 September 2011

Supplemental use of optical diffusion breast imaging for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions

Supplemental use of optical diffusion breast imaging for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR, Sept 2011, vol. 197(3), p. 732-739.

Moon, JH, et al.

http://www.ajronline.org/content/197/3/732.abstract?rss=1

The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of optical diffusion breast imaging in patients who underwent conventional ultrasound followed by surgery or biopsy.

Monday, 9 March 2009

AJR March 2009 Vol. 192 No. 3

Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast: MRI Features of Pure and Mixed Forms with Histopathologic Correlation
Shuichi Monzawa, Masaki Yokokawa, Toshiko Sakuma, Shintaro Takao et al
AJR 2009;192:125-131
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/3/W125

Digital Mammography-Guided Skin Marking for Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Microcalcifications
Nariya Cho and Woo Kyung Moon
AJR 2009;192:132-136
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/3/W132

MRI and PET/CT for Triaging Stage IB Clinically Operable Cervical Cancer to Appropriate Therapy: Decision Analysis to Assess Patient Outcomes
Pari V. Pandharipande, Garry Choy, Marcela G. del Carmen et al
AJR 2009;192:802-814
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/3/802

The Many Faces of Fat Necrosis in the Breast
Jorge L. Taboada, Tanya W. Stephens, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Kathleen R. Brandt, and Gary J. Whitman
AJR 2009;192:815-825
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/3/815

Friday, 2 January 2009

American Journal of Roentgenology Jan 2009

Timed Efficiency of Interpretation of Digital and Film-Screen Screening Mammograms
Tamara Miner Haygood, Jihong Wang, E. Neely Atkinson et al
AJR 2009;192:216-220
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/1/216

Sonographic Surveillance for the Detection of Contralateral Metachronous Breast Cancer in an Asian Population
Min Jung Kim, Eun-Kyung Kim, Jin Young Kwak et al
AJR 2009;192:221-228
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/1/221

Frequency and Upgrade Rates of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed at Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: 9-Versus 11-Gauge
Peter R. Eby, Jennifer E. Ochsner, Wendy B. DeMartini et al
AJR 2009;192:229-234
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/192/1/229

Friday, 25 July 2008

Imaging breast augmentation and reconstruction.

Imaging breast augmentation and reconstruction.
The British journal of radiology, Jul 2008 (epub: 14 Apr 2008), vol. 81, no. 967,
p. 587-95, 8 refs
Glynn-C, Litherland-J.
Abstract
Breast augmentation and breast reconstruction, either immediate or delayed, are increasingly common operations. All radiologists need to be able to recognize the normal appearances of the more commonly used implants on various imaging modalities, and breast radiologists in particular are facing new challenges when imaging the women involved. This article aims to review the normal and abnormal findings in women who have had breast augmentation and reconstruction, including implant insertion and reconstruction by autologous myocutaneous flaps.

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 122(1) July 2008

Link to journal
Wang, Hongyan M.D.; Jiang, Yuxin M.D.; Meng, Hua M.D.; Yu, Yuan M.D.; Qi, Keming M.D.;
Sonographic Assessment on Breast Augmentation after Autologous Fat Graft. [Editorial]
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 122(1):36e-38e, July 2008.

Rozen, Warren M. , Phillips, Timoth J et al
A New Preoperative Imaging Modality for Free Flaps in Breast Reconstruction: Computed Tomographic Angiography.[Editorial]
Source
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 122(1):38e-40e, July 2008.