Comparison of Telfa Rolling and a Closed Washing System for Autologous Fat Processing Techniques in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

 

Comparison of Telfa Rolling and a Closed Washing System for Autologous Fat Processing Techniques in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

 

Valmadrid, Al C.; Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos; Wormer, Blair A.; Farinas, Angel F.; Wang, Li; Al Kassis, Salam; Perdikis, Galen; Braun, Stephane A.; Higdon, Kent K

 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: September 2020 - Volume 146 - Issue 3 - p 486-497

 

Background:

The purpose of this study was to compare the commonly used fat grafting techniques—Telfa rolling and a closed washing system—in breast reconstruction patients.

Methods:

Consecutive patients undergoing fat grafting were retrospectively reviewed and grouped by technique. Patients with less than 180 days of follow-up were excluded. Demographics, operative details, and complications were compared using univariate analysis with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results:

Between January of 2013 and September of 2017, 186 women underwent a total of 319 fat grafting procedures. There was no difference in demographics, number of procedures performed, volume of fat grafted, and number of days after reconstruction that fat grafting was performed between groups (p > 0.05). Telfa rolling patients had longer operative times for second fat grafting procedures (implant exchange often completed prior) [100.0 minutes (range, 60.0 to 150.0 minutes) versus 79.0 minutes (range, 64.0 to 94.0 minutes); p = 0.03]. Telfa rolling breasts had more palpable masses requiring imaging (26.0 percent versus 14.4 percent; p = 0.01) and an increased incidence of fat necrosis (20.6 percent versus 8.0 percent; p < 0.01). The closed washing system was found to be an independent predictor of decreased rates of imaging-confirmed fat necrosis (OR, 0.29; p = 0.048). There was no difference in fat necrosis excision or cancer recurrence between the groups.

Conclusion:

The closed washing system was independently associated with decreased rates of imaging-confirmed fat necrosis compared to Telfa rolling without an increase in other complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques

Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastopexy Utilizing an Inferiorly Based Adipodermal Flap: Our Experience with Prepectoral and Subpectoral Techniques

by Mosharrafa, Ali M.; Mosharrafa, Tamir M.; Zannis, Victor J. 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: May 2020 - Volume 145 - Issue 5 - p 1125-1133

Background: Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction continues to grow in popularity among reconstructive breast surgeons and patients alike. Women with large breasts and ptosis are often thought not to be candidates for nipple sparing or direct-to-implant reconstruction. The authors utilized a single-stage, nipple-sparing, direct-to-implant reconstruction with simultaneous mastopexy, while the nipple-areolar complex was kept viable on an inferiorly based adipodermal flap in a single stage. They report their experience and outcomes using this approach in women with breast ptosis and/or macromastia.

Methods: The authors reviewed all direct-to-implant reconstructions with simultaneous nipple-sparing mastopexies performed from June of 2015 to March of 2019. Sixty-five patients and 125 breast reconstructions were analyzed.

Results: Among the 65 patients (125 breast reconstructions), 15 (23 percent) had implants placed in the prepectoral space, and 50 (77 percent) had them placed subpectorally. Forty-seven patients (72 percent) had acellular dermal matrix used. Partial nipple-areolar complex necrosis occurred in six patients (9 percent). Other complications included partial mastectomy flap necrosis (n = 8 patients, 12 percent), implant exposure (n = 3, 4 percent), infection (n = 1, 1 percent), capsular contracture (n = 4, 6 percent), and reoperation (n = 11, 16 percent). Mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 3 to 47 months). There have been no cancer recurrences reported in any participants to date.

Conclusions: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with mastopexy and immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction dramatically improved the authors’ results for implant-based breast reconstruction patients. The higher than expected explantation rate of 7 percent early in the study has since improved. This approach provides an opportunity to expand indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction to women with breast ptosis and/or macromastia. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction to a Single Set of Internal Mammary Vessels: Technique, Safety, and Outcomes after 250 Flaps

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction to a Single Set of Internal Mammary Vessels: Technique, Safety, and Outcomes after 250 Flaps

by Opsomer, Dries; D’Arpa, Salvatore; Benmeridja, Lara; Stillaert, Filip; Noel, Warren; Van Landuyt, Koenraad 

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: October 2019 - Volume 144 - Issue 4 - p 554e-564e

Background: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. In bilateral cases, both flaps are often anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels on either side of the sternum. The authors propose a method in which both flaps are anastomosed to only the right side internal mammary artery and vein.

Methods: Between November of 2009 and March of 2018, 125 patients underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with this technique. One flap is perfused by the anterograde proximal internal mammary artery and the second one by the retrograde distal internal mammary artery after presternal tunneling. Patient demographics and operative details were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Two hundred fifty flaps were performed. One hundred fifty-two flaps were prophylactic or primary reconstructions (60.8 percent), 70 were secondary reconstructions (28 percent), and 28 were tertiary reconstructions (11.2 percent). Mean patient age was 46 years, and the mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. Sixty patients underwent radiation therapy or chemotherapy (48 percent). The authors encountered one significant partial failure (0.4 percent) and nine complete flap failures (3.6 percent). The authors did not see a statistically significant predisposition for failure comparing the retrograde with the anterograde flow flaps, nor when comparing the tunneled with the nontunneled flaps.

Conclusions: The authors’ results show that anastomosing both DIEP flaps to a single set of mammary vessels is safe and reliable. The authors conclude that the retrograde flow through the distal internal mammary artery is sufficient for free flap perfusion and that subcutaneous tunneling of a free flap pedicle does not predispose to flap failure. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.